Money is still the measure of efficiency and the best way to get one’s agenda through, at least in the corporate world, writes Thurén.
I got to know a graduate engineer who works in a large international company. He said that he is most motivated in working life by situations in which he manages to save the energy of large machines or reduce emissions through various actions.
If, for example, a large process industry factory can be made to operate in such a way that it does the same work but saves even 1% of energy, the savings when scaled up are enormous. Saving is often saving both in terms of emissions and money.
The Master of Science in Engineering is also the mother of a small child, and she is interested above all in what kind of planet we leave to our children.
We started to think about whether decisions could be justified or tried to be carried through by talking directly about the environmental aspect, such as emissions, biodiversity or the climate crisis. We came to the conclusion that no. Money is still the measure of efficiency and the best way to get one’s agenda through, at least in the corporate world.
…
Julia Thurén’s column: Money is a soft value, the environment is a hard valueRead More »